The street I grew up on still exists. Same name, same length, still turning at the same point at the lower end. And yet when I go there I recognise nothing. This is not nostalgia — nostalgia requires that something be lost. Nothing here was lost. Everything simply changed one item at a time, and no single change was large enough to notice.
The building nobody remembers
A city’s memory is not held in archives. It is held in what people say to one another: there, where the pharmacy used to be. That phrase works for as long as there is a generation who remembers the pharmacy. After that it becomes a useless direction — and the address disappears twice.1
A building does not vanish when it is demolished. It vanishes when naming it stops working as a direction.
Speed
The problem is not construction. Cities have always been built. The problem is the rate — and specifically that the rate now exceeds the speed at which a city tells itself its own history.
When a district changes three times in eleven years, no version has time to become the thing that was here before. What remains is a present that feels provisional.
What can be done
Honestly, not much. But one thing: writing it down.
Not conservation — conservation is expensive and often impossible. Just the record. Who lived there, what was on the ground floor, at what hour the windows opened. It will not save the building. But it leaves something a person can return to when there, where the pharmacy used to be has stopped meaning anything at all.
Footnotes
-
The first time when the building comes down; the second when the last person stops mentioning it. ↩